Cases 21 - 30 of 646
Evans v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02076
Petitioner:
Kejuan Evans
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Todd Giffen v. Joseph Biden
as 23-6241
Petitioner / Appellant:
TODD MICHAEL GIFFEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., MERRICK B. GARLAND and WARDEN BUTNER FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER
MEYERS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
DAVID MEYERS
Respondent:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Gary B. Williams
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ali v. Streeval
as 7:2023cv00069
Petitioner:
Hassan Sharif Ali
Respondent:
JF Caraway, B. Valle, Ian Connors and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dena Minton v. Miranda Richardson
as 23-6010
Petitioner / Appellant:
DENA INEZ MINTON
Respondent / Appellee:
MIRANDA B. RICHARDSON
Perkins v. Risk Assessment Panel
as 5:2022hc02205
Petitioner:
Victor B. Perkins
Respondent:
Risk Assessment Panel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haltiwanger v. Warden Turbeville Correctional Institution
as 6:2022cv03769
Petitioner:
Gerald B Haltiwanger, Jr
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Turbeville Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Gary v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7304
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY TYRONE GARY, a/k/a Gregory Tyrone Gary-Bey
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, Red Onion State Prison
Michael Webb v. B. Kanode
as 22-7291
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL A. WEBB
Respondent / Appellee:
B. L. KANODE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
