Cases 21 - 30 of 56
James Strouse v. Eric Wilson
as 15-6328
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES STROUSE
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, Federal Correctional Complex in Petersburg
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DHO BENNETT and D. EVANS, Officer
Bennett v. Reynolds
as 9:2014cv03867
Petitioner:
Leroy Bennett
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WALLER v. PERRY
as 1:2014cv00763
Petitioner:
JAMES BENNETT WALLER, JR.
Respondent:
FRANK PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Strouse v. E. Wilson
as 14-6423
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES STROUSE
Respondent - Appellee:
E. D. WILSON, Warden, BERNARDO, SIS, LAGRONE, SIS and others
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, KEVIN KIDDY, Unit Manager, MENDEZ, SIS and others
Bennett v. Paul
as 2:2013cv00068
Petitioner:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Respondent:
Scott Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Petersburg Federal Correctional Complex et al
as 1:2013cv00996
Petitioner:
Charles Louis Jones
Respondent:
Petersburg Federal Correctional Complex and W. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bennett v. South Carolina, State of
as 2:2013cv02144
Petitioner:
Trenton Bennett
Respondent:
Warden Manning Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strouse v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2013cv00323
Petitioner:
James Strouse
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, E. D. Wilson, Dho Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bennett v. Edgecombe County Jail
as 5:2013hc02095
Petitioner:
Osborne Parnell Bennett, Jr.
Respondent:
Edgecombe County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coyt Bryant v. Terry O'Brien
as 12-8010
Petitioner - Appellant:
COYT BRYANT
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY O'BRIEN and JOHN HOWARD BENNETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
