Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Michael Kennedy v. Edward Reilly, Jr.
as 10-6390
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY, #35377-098
Respondent - Appellee:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., Chairman, United States Parole Commission, CRANSTON J. MITCHELL, Commissioner, United States Parole Commission, PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, Commissioner, United States Parole Commission and others
Michael Kennedy v. Michael Allera
as 09-7556
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. ALLERA and KATHY SEIFERT, Dr.
Michael Kennedy v. US
as 09-7306
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD KENNEDY
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kennedy v. Reilly et al
as 1:2009cv01802
Petitioner:
Michael Edward Kennedy
Respondent:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell, Patricia K. Cushwa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Watson et al
as 7:2009cv00144
Petitioner:
Marquise Leon Nelson
Respondent:
Bryan Watson, Wendy Brown, Gene M. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Deboo
as 2:2008cv00110
Petitioner:
Scott P. Kennedy
Respondent:
Kuma Deboo
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KENNEDY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2008cv00723
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. KENNEDY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. Phillips
as 2:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Kennedy
Defendant:
Wayne Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kennedy v. Cragway et al
as 1:2007cv01538
Petitioner:
Robert Kennedy
Respondent:
Jack Cragway and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Solomon
as 3:2007cv00059
Petitioner:
Robert E. Kennedy
Respondent:
Lawrence Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
