Cases 51 - 60 of 921
Woodall, Jr. v. Antinelle
as 5:2023cv00186
Petitioner:
Mark E. Woodall, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Antinelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frazier v. Warden E Strong
as 8:2023cv01986
Petitioner:
Alexander Roland Frazier, Jr
Respondent:
Warden E Strong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yates v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023hc02078
Petitioner:
William Yates
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee, Sean T. Dillard, Teresa O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marion v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00341
Petitioner:
Sedric Rashad Marion
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lacey v. Schaefer
as 1:2023cv00540
Petitioner:
Michael E. Lacey
Respondent:
George E. Schaefer, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. ISHEE
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
TODD E. ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00169
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Unknown and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Unknown and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ EL v. JACOBS
as 1:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
RA SAADI LENNOX HERNANDEZ EL
Respondent:
STEPHEN JACOBS, DAVIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, E. EDWARD VOGLER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lacey v Nield, Depierre & Vasta PLC
as 1:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Michael E. Lacey
Defendant:
Nield, Depierrre & Vasta PLC
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
