Cases 61 - 70 of 37,112
Williams v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00183
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Petitioner:
Brandon Monquee Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stargell v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00377
Petitioner:
Darion Stargell
Respondent:
Mr. W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruffin v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
Christopher Ruffin
Respondent:
Melissa Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harrod v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv02608
Petitioner:
Antonio S. Harrod
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Paige C. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oxendine v. Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03995
Petitioner:
Steven Wayne Oxendine
Respondent:
Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Warden of J.C.I
as 1:2024cv02615
Respondent:
Warden of J.C.I
Petitioner:
Craig Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Millner v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv04025
Petitioner:
Clyde Millner
Respondent:
Warden of Bennettsville Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moore v. Artrip
as 7:2024cv00619
Respondent:
Warden Jeffery Artrip
Petitioner:
Aaron Randolph Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00131
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Petitioner:
Jerry Charles Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bennett v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv01253
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Petitioner:
Alvon Terrance Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
