Cases 1 - 10 of 1,462
Johnson v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02088
Petitioner:
Marty Johnson
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Turean T. Johnson
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dwayne Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6367
Petitioner:
DWAYNE L. JOHNSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Johnson v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2024cv01623
Petitioner:
Mickey Markell Johnson
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randolph Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6280
Petitioner:
RANDOLPH WAKEEM JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of D.O.C.
Deandre Johnson v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6272
Petitioner:
DEANDRE JOHNSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Johnson v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Houston P. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02034
Petitioner:
Bradley Johnson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00064
Petitioner:
Artis Denard Johnson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02004
Petitioner:
Jabon Phillip Johnson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
