General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 484
Schmuhl v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00375
Petitioner: Andrew Gilbert Schmuhl
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brock v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Petitioner: Andrew Brock, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia and Circuit Court of the City of Suffolk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brock v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00298
Petitioner: Andrew Brock, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner: MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent: HAROLD W. CLARKE
Bowers v. Warden William Langdon, III
as 0:2024cv00287
Petitioner: David Andrew Bowers
Respondent: Warden William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson v. Bodiford et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Petitioner: Ryan Andrew Gibson
Respondent: Scott Bodiford and Walter H. Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
MOORE v. CASSIDY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00021
Petitioner: ANDREW SCOTT MOORE
Respondent: DAVID CASSIDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Richardson v. Donnie Ames
as 23-7147
Petitioner / Appellant: RAYMOND ANDREW RICHARDSON
Respondent / Appellee: DONNIE AMES, Superintendent
Julius Reason, III v. Warden Janson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-7129
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIUS ANDREW REASON, III
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN JANSON
Andrews v. State of Maryland
as 1:2023cv03023
Petitioner: David C. Andrews
Respondent: State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?