Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rashaud Azar El v. Cabarrus County
as 24-6573
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL, d/b/a Jerimy Love
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS, Cabarrus County Manager and others
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love, Rashaud Hussein Azar El and Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussem Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs, Angel Gonzalez and others
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barlow v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv03013
Petitioner:
Joshua Barlow
Respondent:
Paige C. Jones and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maurice Owens, II v. Harold Clarke
as 13-7593
Petitioner - Appellant:
MAURICE BARLOW OWENS, II
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Owens v. Clarke
as 3:2012cv00234
Petitioner:
Maurice Barlow Owens, II
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Owens v. Clark
as 7:2012cv00144
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Petitioner:
Maurice Barlow Owens, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodas Amador v. Barlow
as 1:2011cv00760
Petitioner:
Karla Yaneth Rodas Amador
Respondent:
Lewis Barlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RICHMOND v. BARLOW
as 2:2010cv00095
Petitioner:
Donnell Richmond
Respondent:
Barlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
