Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Wade
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kornegay v. Warden John/Jane Doe
as 5:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
Raymond Kornegay
Respondent:
Warden John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fiorito v. Winfield et al
as 6:2021cv02329
Petitioner:
Michael Fiorito
Respondent:
Warden Winfield, T. Miller, Ms. Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anderson v. Wood et al
as 2:2020cv00027
Defendant:
J. Hazel Wood, Dr. Jane Doe and J.D. Diggs
Plaintiff:
Chris R. Anderson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gary v. The People of the State of Maryland and Baltimore Cty et al
as 1:2019cv01348
Petitioner:
Kevin Wayne Gary
Respondent:
The People of the State of Maryland and Baltimore Cty, Jane Doe 1-10, David E. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Marino et al v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00061
Petitioner:
Vincent Michael Marino and Juan Carlos Ortiz-Abreu
Respondent:
Jennifer Saad, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Squires and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roberts v. Walker et al
as 1:2014cv00720
Plaintiff:
Aaron B. Roberts
Defendant:
Corey Walker, R. Ebersole, A. Hartle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Woods v. Warden Zych
as 12-7497
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRY EUGENE WOODS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN ZYCH, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Andre Glaude v. Warden Zych
as 12-6694
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDRE GLAUDE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN ZYCH
Respondent:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, JUDGMENT OF THE HONORABLE ABRECHT and others
Woods v. Zych et al
as 7:2012cv00033
Respondent:
Jane Doe, John Doe, United States Of America and others
Petitioner:
Terry Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
