Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Miller v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2023cv00547
Petitioner:
Frankie Marvin Miller, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00261
Petitioner:
Natalie L. Miller
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Warden
as 5:2023hc02200
Petitioner:
Natalie L. Miller
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanford v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
James Lewis Sanford
Respondent:
United States of America and Quinton Miller
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Barrington Miller
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Shaquille Miller
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Herny v. Miller
as 1:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Ashley Dean Herny
Respondent:
Quentin Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Angela Miller v. J. D. Sallaz
as 22-7180
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGELA DAWN MILLER
Respondent / Appellee:
J. D. SALLAZ, Superintendent
Miller v. Warden
as 1:2022cv00380
Petitioner:
Darrell W. Miller
Respondent:
The United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Warden of FCI Edgefield Satellite Camp
as 5:2022cv01860
Petitioner:
Michael Shane Miller
Respondent:
Warden and Warden of FCI Edgefield Satellite Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
