Cases 1 - 10 of 1,654
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner:
Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent:
Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ZABOROWSKI v. GOBBLE et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Petitioner:
CONRAD WILLIAM ZABOROWSKI
Respondent:
CANDACE GOBBLE and ALAMANCE COUNTY DSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02096
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, JESSICA SAGE and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rembold v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01328
Petitioner:
Donald G. Rembold
Respondent:
William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02081
Petitioner:
Ritchie Williams
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mulder v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02070
Petitioner:
William Brian Mulder
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hunt v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00888
Petitioner:
Kareem Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Warden William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gopshes v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00854
Petitioner:
Cokie Joe Gopshes, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, Judge William V. Tucker and Clerk of Court Wayne Robery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
