Cases 21 - 30 of 94
LLOYD v. SCOTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant:
SCOTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, EARL HAYWOOD, JESSICA SADOVNIKOV and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN O'BRIAN LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUFFKIN et al v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2018cv00502
Plaintiff:
LLOYD BUFFKIN , KIM CALDWELL and ROBERT PARHAM
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS , ABHAY AGARWAL , KENNETH LASSITER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lloyd v. James et al
as 1:2018cv01512
Plaintiff:
Mario Antwan Lloyd
Defendant:
Lt. James, Lt. Lumpkin, Sgt. Shinah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Lloyd v. Garrett Glennon
as 18-6087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
GARRETT GLENNON, Deputy State's Attorney for Baltimore County, Maryland and J. PHILIP MORGAN
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, CONTAH NIMELY, M.D. and LORI SLAVICK, P.A.
Lloyd Michael Warren v. Nurse Gray
as 17-7400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD MICHAEL WARREN
Defendant - Appellee:
NURSE GRAY, Nurse, OFFICER MCGRATH, Jail Officer and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLYTHE, Jail Officer
Duane Letroy Berry v. Kristina Lloyd
as 17-7353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTINA LLOYD, Psychologist and MICHELLE DUBE, Psychologist
Warren v. Gray et al
as 1:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Michael Warren
Defendant:
Nurse Gray, Officer McGrath and Officer Blythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Lloyd et al
as 5:2016ct03341
Plaintiff:
Duane Letroy Berry
Defendant:
Kristina Lloyd and Michelle Dube
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bright v. Wexford Health
as 1:2016cv02528
Plaintiff:
William Bright
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Robustiano Barrera, Kimberly Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Glennon et al
as 1:2016cv02160
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lloyd
Defendant:
Garrett Glennon and J. Philip Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
