Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Gold v. Smalls et al
as 5:2013cv03353
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Gold
Defendant:
Michael Smalls, Jr, Andrew G Hayes, Rosalyn W Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minton v. Summers et al
as 5:2013ct03270
Plaintiff:
Scott Minton
Defendant:
Lynn Summers and David Guile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Willingham v. Lynn Summer
as 13-6160
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES D. WILLINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
LYNN SUMMERS, Supt. Hoke CI, G. CRUTCHFIELD, Asst. Programs Hoke CI, K. STAND BACK, Asst. Hoke CI and others
Carlton Harris v. Pamela Dottelli
as 12-7993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLTON FRANCIS HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA DOTTELLIS, Director, Office of the Sheriff, CHARLES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, HORRELL, c/o #2490 and others
Willingham v. Summers et al
as 1:2012de00336
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Willingham
Defendant:
Lynn Summers, G. Crutchfeild, K. Stand Back and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Byars et al
as 8:2012cv01480
Plaintiff:
William Ray Ward
Defendant:
William R Byars and Lake E Summers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson v. BOP et al
as 3:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jodi Darlene Dodson
Defendant:
BOP, Bannum, Inc., Carolyn Dunson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Mount Olive Correctional Center et al
as 2:2012cv00788
Plaintiff:
Gregg Dulaney Smith
Defendant:
Mount Olive Correctional Center, James Rubenstein, Samuel Keenan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharper v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv00777
Plaintiff:
Henry Sharper
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Malone Thompson Summers and Ott and Paige J Gossett
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mayfield v. Henderson County Detention Center et al
as 7:2008cv00331
Plaintiff:
Howard Bradley Mayfield
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center, Rowland, Summers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
