Cases 41 - 50 of 457
Freeman v. Arnold et al
as 9:2022cv03249
Petitioner:
Fred Freeman
Respondent:
Kelly B. Arnold, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Deborah S. McKeown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Brown v. Putney et al.
as 3:2022cv00620
Plaintiff:
Cedric L. Brown
Defendant:
Unknown, Cynthia Putney, Ms. Baley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Willis v. Mark Ruff
as 22-7055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW REGINALD WILLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK C. RUFF, OFFICER KELLY TUDOR and SGT. JAMES YOWELL
Jean Germain v. William Beeman
as 22-7048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN BERNARD GERMAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM BEEMAN, RN, HOWARD LEE COOK, Dr., JOHN DOE, Dr. and others
Hale v. Slaw et al
as 7:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Kelly Hale
Defendant:
D. A. Slaw, M. J. Robinson, Karen Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS v. KYLE et al
as 1:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
LEVAN LAFORREST SANDERS
Defendant:
KELLY KYLE and HOMICIDE DET. BRUSCNO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Williams et al
as 7:2022cv00502
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Defendant:
Lieutenant Michael Williams, Unit Manager Larry Ross Collins, Captain Still and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leroy Cain v. Tonya Chapman
as 22-6685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEROY DEXTER CAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
TONYA CHAPMAN, Parole Board Chairwoman, DONNA SHIFFLETT, KELLY THOMASSON and others
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01411
Plaintiff:
Antwoin McNeil
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks, A. Dupree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammock v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv01386
Plaintiff:
Terrence Hammock
Defendant:
Gail Watts, Renard Brooks, Major Robert Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
