Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Williams v. Bowens et al
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Demond Williams
Defendant:
Officer Bowens, Officer MakanJuda, Officer Jeffers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvin Bowens v. J. Vaws
as 23-6665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN BOWENS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. VAWS, State Trooper #9256
Wable v. North Central Regional Jail (Jane Doe) et al
as 5:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond Wable
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail (Jane Doe), Jane Doe, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowens v. Vaws
as 1:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
Alvin Bowens
Defendant:
J. Vaws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Cisco et al
as 8:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Ivey Nicole Byrd
Defendant:
Lt Cisco, Sgt Capps, Judge Roper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bowens v. Ishee et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Darius Bowens and Darious Bowens
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Eddie Buffaloe, Mike Slagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Bowen et al
as 7:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Zach Bowen and Cindi L. Smoot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Sumter-Lee Regional Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00670
Defendant:
Lt. Reddick, Sr. Cpl. Abraham, Lt. John Shirah and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Meritus Medical Center, Inc.
as 8:2020cv01069
Defendant:
Meritus Medical Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stanley W. Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Mutafis v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 5:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Tim Bowen, Dept. of Corrections "WVa" Commissioner, Correctional Officer Woman in Tower and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Theodore Mutafis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
