Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dustin Scott v. Lisa Crowder
as 23-6550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTIN GENE SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA CROWDER, Nurse
Defendant:
MARK MOREL, Sergeant, HARVEN A. CROUSE DETENTION CENTER, BILL BEAM, Superintendent/Sheriff and others
Scott v. Harven A. Crouse Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Dustin Gene Scott
Defendant:
Harven A. Crouse Detention Center, Bill Beam, Vida Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdullah-Malik v. Cathy et al
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Nafis Akeem Alim Abdullah Malik and Nafis Akeem-Alim Abdullah-Malik
Defendant:
Eddie Cathy, FNU Rogers, FNU Pursor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Davidson et al
as 1:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
Rusty Anderson
Defendant:
Gene Davidson, 12 or More Grand Jurors, FNU Etters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arbogast v. Jividen et al
as 5:2020cv00251
Defendant:
Jeremy Metz, C.O. Buzzart, Dan Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
John Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Beam et al
as 7:2019cv00504
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Hall
Defendant:
Miller and Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jotham Simmons v. Jeremiah Beam
as 16-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOTHAM SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEREMIAH BEAM, H. ERIC COHOON and THE CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH
Simmons v. Beam et al
as 4:2015cv03401
Plaintiff:
Jotham R Simmons
Defendant:
Jeremiah Beam, H Eric Cohoon and Myrtle Beach, The City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beam v. Wiygul et al
as 7:2014cv00888
Plaintiff:
Melvin Beam
Defendant:
Elizabeth P Wiygul, James G Bogle, Jr, Jim Bogle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac Woods v. County of Wilson
as 13-7970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISAAC LEE WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF WILSON, WILSON COUNTY MANAGER, WAYNE V. GAY, Sheriff of Wilson County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
