Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Meyers v. Perry et al
as 2:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Officer Mr. Lockhart, Ofc. Ms. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Latuga et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Plaintiff:
Corieonte L. Jackson
Defendant:
Wolcott Rivers P.C., Brian M. Latuga and Janee' D. Joslin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Studel et al
as 3:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
James L. Jackson
Defendant:
Danata Studel, FNU Atwaters, FNU House-Wong and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cooper et al
as 3:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
James L. Jackson
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Robert C. Lewis, Wade Allen Barber, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Jarvis
as 1:2010cv00611
Plaintiff:
Quinten L. Jackson
Defendant:
Diane Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Jarvis et al
as 1:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Quinten L. Jackson
Defendant:
Diane Jarvis, Kendle, Kimberley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Jarvis et al
as 1:2009cv03083
Plaintiff:
Quinten L. Jackson
Defendant:
Diane Jarvis, Washington County Detention Center and Hagerstown Drug Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2009cv00560
Plaintiff:
Rodney L. Jackson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institution in Beckley, West Virginia and Marty C. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael McRae v. Michael Easley
as 08-7853
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL EASLEY, BOYD BENNETT, MICHAEL S. HAMDEN and others
Layfield v. I.G.O. et al
as 1:2008cv02066
Plaintiff:
Chris R. Layfield
Defendant:
I.G.O., D.O.C. and L. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
