Cases 1 - 10 of 94
Jordan v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 3:2024cv02824
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bryan Jordan
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Lee County Sheriff's Office, John E. Slaten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Overton v. Salem VAMC of Roanoke Virginia
as 7:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Herbert Norris Overton
Defendant:
Salem VAMC of Roanoke Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
NORRIS v. DRISCHLER
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
RICKY NORRIS
Defendant:
K. DRISCHLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROCHELLE v. BOYER
as 1:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
NORRIS DWAYNE ROCHELLE
Defendant:
JULIE CATHERINE BOYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemus Berrios v. Gouff et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Defendant:
Brian Gouff, Kenneth Hardman, Ms. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris Smith v. Rockingham Regional Jail
as 23-6257
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORRIS ELLWOOD SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY REGIONAL JAIL
Marquez v. Cooper et al
as 6:2022cv04592
Plaintiff:
Emily Marquez
Defendant:
Jonathon Cooper, Brayden Leopold, Justice Rallis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Cassie Crisano v. Rappahanock Regional Jail
as 22-6130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIE C. CRISANO
Defendant / Appellee:
RAPPAHANOCK REGIONAL JAIL, PHIL GRIMES, Superintendent (Retired and REBECCA NORRIS, Administrator of the Estate of Houston Norris
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McDaniel v. Campbell et al
as 7:2021cv00649
Petitioner:
Michael W. McDaniel
Defendant:
Mr. Campbell and Mr. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
