Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Jones v. Fink et al
as 2:2015cv00367
Plaintiff:
Mariah Jones
Defendant:
Dr. Julie A. Fink and Nakeshia S. Barrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Annis Lloyd v. Lachlan MacNeish
as 15-6587
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
LACHLAN MACNEISH, MARTIN J. ADAMS, KENNETH SARVIS and others
Defendant:
EDWARD J. MCMAHON, A. R. FALES, JR., G. D. JOHNSON and others
Vitalis v. Stirling et al
as 0:2015cv01053
Plaintiff:
Hamid Yazid Vitalis
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Sandra Barrett and Bernard McKie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Gibbons et al
as 5:2014cv03901
Plaintiff:
Rafeal Barrett
Defendant:
T Gibbons, T James and Mr Adger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Gibbons
as 5:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Rafeal Barrett
Defendant:
T Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Barrett et al
as 9:2013cv03155
Plaintiff:
Zljahuc L James
Defendant:
SHU Officer Barrett and SHU Officer M Harr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Martin, Jr. v. William Byars, Jr.
as 13-7326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY W. MARTIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM ROBERT BYARS, JR., Director, DR. MOORE, Director of Medical Services, DR. T. BYRNE, ACI and others
Defendant:
JAMIE R. WRESSEY, RN Health Care Authority SC Dept of Corrections, DANIEL MURPHY, Department of Corrections Division Inspection SCDC, ALTHEA B. MYERS, Chief Deputy Office of the Investigation & Enforcement and others
Barrett v. Branker et al
as 5:2012ct03120
Plaintiff:
Urel A. Barrett
Defendant:
G.J. Branker, B. Pulley, R. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HELMS v. RANSOM
as 1:2010cv00987
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. HELMS
Defendant:
CHANDRA RANSOM , E. MEEKINS , R. HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Annis Lloyd v. Lieutenant Dowdy
as 09-6772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT DOWDY, LIEUTENANT SARVIS, CORPORAL BARRETT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
