Cases 41 - 50 of 19,824
Whitehurst v. Lewis et al
as 5:2024ct03136
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Timothy L. Lewis, Mashell L. Wilson and Sgt. D. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate
as 5:2024ct03137
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Lovett
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Damarcus Da'shaun Dixon
Defendant:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
James v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03134
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Rich et al
as 5:2024ct03135
Plaintiff:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rich, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Claudio v. State Farm Correctional Center et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Carlos Figueroa Claudio
Defendant:
State Farm Correctional Center and VA Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.L. et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
M.L., E.W. and S.W.
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Colette Peters, Christopher Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goss v. Stonebreaker
as 2:2024cv03138
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Goss
Defendant:
Donnie E. Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steed v. Lynch
as 5:2024ct03133
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed and Byron Lynn Steed
Defendant:
Sergeant Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
