Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Williams v. Leu et al
as 5:2022ct03403
Plaintiff:
Raynard Williams
Defendant:
Warden D. Leu, Lieutenant Hackett, Lieutenant Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Abel v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
Robert Abel
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FNU/LNU, Ian Conners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Webster Williams, III v. Michael Carvajal
as 22-6495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WEBSTER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, III
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Amicus Curiae:
ARC OF THE UNITED STATES, MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA and NATIONAL DISABILITY RIGHTS NETWORK
Michael Rankins v. Michael Carvajal
as 22-6322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of Bureau of Prisons, J.C. PETRUCC, Regional Director, JOHN OR JANE DOE, Food Service Administrator and others
Brandon v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00540
Plaintiff:
Shanna Brandon
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Asplund v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Janette M. Asplund
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rankins v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2021cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Michael D. Carvajal, J. C. Petrucc, John or Jane Doe and others
Petitioner:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belcher v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00529
Plaintiff:
Rhonda S. Belcher
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Plaintiff:
Megan Moore
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Syslo v. Carver et al
as 1:2021cv00533
Plaintiff:
Taylor Syslo
Defendant:
Warden Carver and BOP Director Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
