Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Garcia v. Barnes et al
as 9:2023cv01877
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Garcia
Defendant:
Nannette F. Barnes, Ms. Benson, Lietenant Lugo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv01935
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Alex D. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodnett v. Stolle et al
as 2:2018cv00440
Defendant:
J. Bartolomeo, N. Apfel, G. Ulrich and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Hodnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex Taylor v. Sylvia Jone
as 13-7673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX D. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA JONES, Mailroom Staff, LUDREAN BRYANT, Mailroom staff and JOHN DOE, Chairman of CRC, real name of chairman will be obtained during discovery
Taylor v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv02982
Plaintiff:
Alex D Taylor
Defendant:
Sylvia Jones, Ludrean Bryant and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Alex Taylor v. Thierry Nettle
as 12-7697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX D. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
THIERRY D. NETTLES, Major, LESLIE A. DAVIS, Lieutenant, V. STAFFORD, Sergeant and others
Taylor v. Nettles et al
as 1:2011cv01479
Plaintiff:
Alex D Taylor
Defendant:
Thierry Nettles, Leslie Davis, V Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Byars et al
as 1:2011cv00915
Plaintiff:
Alex D Taylor
Defendant:
William Byars, Lloyd Roberts and Van Bebber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAITERS v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2011cv00139
Plaintiff:
QUINEA M. WAITERS
Defendant:
LAURA D. TAYLOR, SHANEESE MELTON, SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
