Cases 1 - 10 of 395
Jonathan Newell v. Ja'barri Davis
as 24-6553
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL, ROY G. DAVIDSON and ANTOINE JERROD WATKINS
Defendant:
JA'BARRI DAVIS, Correctional Officer, A. SINGLETON, Correctional Officer, SGT. JANE DOE DOWNEY and others
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Jackson et al
as 5:2024ct03141
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Darren G. Jackson, Graham H. Atkinson, Gregory K. Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv03259
Plaintiff:
Eric Wright
Defendant:
E. Brown and G. Peabody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Linder v. Tolson et al
as 9:2024cv03159
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wayne Linder
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John G. Hicks, Sgt. Ratchford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
TORSHAZO WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, SAM PAGE, CAPTAIN MS. JENNIFER BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Whilby et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Keith Nichols
Defendant:
P. Whilby, G. Shepherd and Clint Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Linder v. Donald Brown
as 24-6366
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MAURICE LINDER
Defendant:
DONALD G. BROWN, Sheriff of Catawba County, DEPUTY LUNA, DEPUTY COOK and others
Icker v. Grimaldo et al
as 5:2024ct03086
Plaintiff:
Mark Eric Icker
Defendant:
G. Grimaldo, C. Newsom, Mr. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCoy v. Shaw Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00792
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey G. McCoy
Defendant:
Shaw Industries, Inc., Shaw Industries Group, Inc., S.C.D.C. Prison Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
