Cases 1 - 10 of 324
Day v. Rich et al
as 5:2024ct03135
Plaintiff:
Roger Charles Day, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Rich, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Seabrooks v. Richland County et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Seabrooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Richland County, Crayman Harvey, Kevin McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Dennis Smith, Jr. v. Sgt. Rogers
as 24-6324
Plaintiff:
DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
SERGEANT ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, COL. J. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff:
KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Wilson Rogers
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Stone et al
as 5:2024ct03001
Plaintiff:
Jarred J. Ford
Defendant:
Keith Stone, Sheriff Bond Surety, Major Allen Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Greene et al
as 5:2023ct03332
Plaintiff:
Joshua Johnson
Defendant:
Steadman Jody Greene, William Rogers, Bernetta Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILKERSON v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2023cv00962
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WILKERSON
Defendant:
DARYL JACKSON and DANNY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
