Cases 1 - 10 of 799
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
David Little, Jr. v. John Palmer
as 24-6516
Plaintiff:
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN PALMER, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, T. ROBERTSON, Assistant Warden and others
WILLIAMSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
TORSHAZO WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, SAM PAGE, CAPTAIN MS. JENNIFER BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kendall Bowen
Defendant:
Deputy Billy Davis, D. Williams, Lt. Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI and NICOLE R. RAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharif Moore v. Peter Danza
as 24-6391
Plaintiff:
SHARIF HAKIM MOORE
Defendant:
PETER T. DANZA, JASON JARMAN, ANTHONY J. TAYLOR and others
Miller v. Duffy et al
as 6:2024cv02268
Plaintiff:
Chavis T Miller
Defendant:
Lt Susan Duffy, Magon Toth, E Cowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Massey v. Barker et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Massey
Defendant:
Robert T. Barker, Curtis Tate, Peter Buchholte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Evan William Blankenship
Defendant:
Ricky T. Buchanan, H. Helms and A. Scearse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capps v. Hunter et al
as 5:2024ct03079
Plaintiff:
Edward Rummus Capps, III
Defendant:
Sargent T. Hunter, Sargent Farrow and Warden Steven Wadell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
