Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Acosta v. Apex Pipeline Services, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00507
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Apex Pipeline Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Fuji Mountain Steakhouse, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01974
Defendant:
Fuji Mountain Steakhouse, Inc., Jin Zhong Huang and Yi Quing Zhang
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Hot Taco, LLC
as 3:2019cv00237
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Hot Taco, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Woodmore House Assisted Living, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv01468
Defendant:
We Care Adult Day Care Services, Inc., Quality Connection Transporation, Inc., Gwen Terry and others
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. WZM LLC et al
as 6:2019cv01436
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Zhi Ming Wu, WZM LLC, Jenny S Wu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Acosta v. O House LLC et al
as 6:2019cv01435
Defendant:
Raymond Wu, Carrie Zhang, O House LLC and others
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Acosta v. JDCI, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
John Davies, JDCI, Inc. dba Davies Contracting and JDCI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Mejia Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
United States Department Of Labor and R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Mejia Corporation, Armando Mejia, Gloria Mejia and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Holder Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00065
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Holder Inc. and Andrew Holder
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta, et al v. Emerald Contractors, Inc., et al
as 8:2018cv03762
Plaintiff:
U.S. Department of Labor, United States Department of Labor, R. Alexander Acosta and others
Defendant:
Roderick Neither, Sr. and Emerald Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
