Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Riley v. Lonesome Pine Dining, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Defendant:
Debra K. Riggs, Timothy Riggs, Lonesome Pine Dining, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Sue Riley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kirk et al v. Queen City Court Builders, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Riley Kirk, Zachary Silman, Brandon Lohmar and others
Defendant:
Queen City Court Builders, LLC and Speicher Performance Tennis, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Morgan v. Gerstenmaier Consulting, LLC
as 3:2020cv00835
Defendant:
Gerstenmaier Consulting, LLC doing business as HG Design Studio
Plaintiff:
Riley Morgan
Lee et al v. Solar Energy World, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01993
Plaintiff:
Jordan Jackson, Evelio Rodriguez, Christopher Riley and others
Defendant:
Tope Lala, Aloysius E. Gleeson, Geoff Mirkin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yanes v. Accel Heating and Cooling, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv02573
Plaintiff:
Carlos Yanes
Defendant:
Accel Heating and Cooling, LLC and Edward Riley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yanes v. Accel Heating and Cooling, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv02573
Plaintiff:
Carlos Yanes
Defendant:
Accel Heating and Cooling, LLC and Edward Riley, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Montgomery v. Lovin Oven Catering Suffolk Inc et al
as 4:2015cv03214
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hope Montgomery
Defendant:
Lovin' Oven Catering Suffolk Inc, 21 Main North Beach LLC, William Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Riley v. Dolgencorp, LLC.
as 2:2014cv25505
Plaintiff:
Joyce Riley
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Raymer v. Riley Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00394
Plaintiff:
Tommy Raymer
Defendant:
Riley Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Raymer v. Riley Technologies, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Tommy Raymer
Defendant:
Riley Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
