Cases 1 - 8 of 8
West Virginia University Board of Governors v. Sports Fanz, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Chad Rogers and Sports Fanz, LLC
Plaintiff:
West Virginia University Board of Governors
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00575
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Falken Industries, LLC v. Walsh et al
as 1:2015cv01090
Plaintiff:
Falken Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Roger Walsh , Corporate Security, LLC , Pinnacle Protection Service, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roger Seawright v. M. Shanken Communication
as 14-1967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER SEAWRIGHT, Seawright PC Solutions, d/b/a Wall Decor Prints
Defendant - Appellee:
M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, d/b/a Cigaraficionado.com
Seawright v. M. Shanken Communications
as 1:2014cv01326
Plaintiff:
Roger Seawright
Defendant:
M. Shanken Communications
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Maier et al v. Asos PLC et al
as 8:2013cv02052
Plaintiff:
Anton Maier and Roger Maier
Defendant:
Asos PLC and Asos.com Limited
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Roger Cleveland Golf Company Inc v. Prince et al
as 2:2009cv02119
Plaintiff:
Roger Cleveland Golf Company Inc and Roger Cleveland Golf Company Inc
Defendant:
Christopher Prince, Sheldon Shelley and Prince Distribution LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Nelson et al v. Beaufort Liquidation Center LLC et al
as 9:2007cv00811
Plaintiff:
Prince Rogers Nelson, Prince Rogers Nelson, Paisley Park Enterprises Inc and others
Defendant:
Beaufort Liquidation Center LLC, Beaufort Liquidation Center LLC, BLC Inc and others
Counter Claimant:
National Freight Recovery Inc, National Freight Recovery Inc, Jeffrey L Lowe and others
Counter Defendant:
Prince Rogers Nelson and Paisley Park Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
