Supplemental Security Income Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Gonzales v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00345
Plaintiff: Daniel Jason Gonzales
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WILLIAMS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff: JOSEPH DANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant: KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Massenburg v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2023cv05019
Plaintiff: James Daniel Massenburg
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cash v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00006
Plaintiff: Daniel E. Cash, Jr.
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bean v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00208
Plaintiff: Danielle R. Bean
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Quinn v. Kijakazi
as 7:2021cv00600
Plaintiff: Daniel O. Quinn
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Isom v. Kijakazi
as 8:2021cv02808
Plaintiff: Daniel Isom
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party: SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 a
Arnold v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00035
Plaintiff: Daniel Craig Arnold
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marks v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00029
Plaintiff: Jerry Daniel Marks
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DiPiazza v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00735
Plaintiff: Daniel DiPiazza
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?