Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Oppenheimer v. Thompson et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Randal Wade Thompson and Vista-Graphics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Patton et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Rowena P Patton, Patton Property Group, LLC, Rowena P. Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Oppenheimer v. Pugh et al
as 1:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Danny F. Pugh, Paul S. Heathman and Mountain Dreams Realty of WNC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Oppenheimer v. A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and A.C. Schultes of Carolina, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Oppenheimer v. Wilson
as 5:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Jeffrey Wilson
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Storrow et al
as 1:2018cv00297
Defendant:
Joel Leslie Storrow, McGill Associates, P.A., WR-Martin, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer and David Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GARY HESS STUDIOS v. JG MOTORSPORTS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Defendant:
JG MOTORSPORTS, INC., HENDRICK MOTORSPORTS, LLC and JEFF GORDON, INC.
Plaintiff:
GARY HESS STUDIOS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tulk v. Marshall University et al
as 2:2017cv03079
Plaintiff:
Sherry A. Tulk
Defendant:
Marshall University, Jerome Gilbert, West Virginia University and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Capstone Apartment Partners, LLC, et al
as 3:2017cv00110
Defendant:
Capstone Apartment Partners LLC and Brian D. Ford
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Damn Good Doormats, LLC v. Gordon
as 1:2015cv00336
Plaintiff:
Damn Good Doormats, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
