Cases 21 - 30 of 200
McClellan v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott McClellan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv02527
Plaintiff:
Tammy Daniels Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniels v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Cornitha Daniels
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CONTINO v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CONTINO
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Harless v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Harless
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brown v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Westly Daniel Brown
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rhue v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Danielle Rhue
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
US Attorney - Social Security Noticing and Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
King v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv00768
Plaintiff:
Sarita Danielle King
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Quinn v. Kijakazi
as 7:2021cv00600
Plaintiff:
Daniel O. Quinn
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Isom v. Kijakazi
as 8:2021cv02808
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isom
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 a
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
