Cases 11 - 20 of 271
Bryant v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Alicia Bryant and Alicia Renee Bryant
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BRYANT v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
JOHN BRYANT
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
68th Street Site Work Group v. Alban Tractor Co., Incorporated
as 23-1155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
68TH STREET SITE WORK GROUP
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBAN TRACTOR CO., INCORPORATED, C & I LEASING INCORPORATED, RUKERT TERMINALS CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
7-ELEVEN, INC., A&M (2015) LLC, ABACUS CORPORATION and others
BRYANT v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Defendant:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JEFF NIEMAN, KODY H. KINSLEY and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore and Philip E. Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Bryant v. Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv01397
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Mutual Of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
US v. Quentin Bryant
as 22-4590
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
QUENTIN TAVARIS BRYANT, a/k/a Boobie
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Gettys Millwood
as 22-286
Petitioner:
STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
GETTYS BRYANT MILLWOOD, Personal Representative of the Estate of Melissa Buchanan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Bryant v. Spinnaker Resorts, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
John Bryant
Defendant:
Spinnaker Resorts, Inc., King's Creek Plantation, L.L.C. and King's Creek Resorts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
