Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Richard Boggs v. US
as 19-2090
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD E. BOGGS
Respondent / Appellee:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, (writ of mandamus), UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and PETER RAE, and coworkers, et al. as individuals
Richard Boggs v. US
as 19-2084
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, C. K. O'NEAL and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. BOGGS
Washington Group International v. DOWCP
as 14-2136
Petitioner:
WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and FREDDIE BOGGS
Laurel Coal Corporation v. Stevie Boggs
as 14-1821
Petitioner:
LAUREL COAL CORPORATION
Respondent:
STEVIE ALLEN BOGGS and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
US v. Thomas Patric Bogg
as 14-4188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS PATRIC BOGGS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv03464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN THE MATTER OF MEGAN MOBLEY-BOGGS
as 1:2013mc00013
Respondent:
IN THE MATTER OF MEGAN MOBLEY-BOGGS
Roach et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv03800
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Roach , Angelita Roach , Marla G. Hess and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Freedom Mortgage Corp. and Genuine Title LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Boggs v. Fibernet, L.L.C.
as 2:2010cv00933
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Boggs
Defendant:
Fibernet, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
