Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Clemens v. Strawderman et al
as 1:2020cv01240
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Clemens
Defendant:
Technical agents John/Jane Does, United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, JF Strawderman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jacqueline Minifield v. Stephanie Sills
as 20-1301
Defendant:
FRED ROWE, JOHN DEFILIPPI, A. J. CAVE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
STEPHANIE SILLS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACQUELINE Y. MINIFIELD, as Administrator and Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF D'LONDRE MINIFIELD and In her Individual Capacity
Ronald Dandar v. Patent and Trademarks
as 20-1027
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN/JANE DOES, 1 thru 20, PATENT AND TRADEMARKS, United States of America and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Isaac Oliver v. Faye Daniels
as 19-7484
Defendant / Appellee:
FAYE DANIELS, Superintendent, RICHARD O. BROADWELL, III, ALICE MUSSARI, Supervising Nurse and others
Defendant:
BARBARA MESSER, Utilization Review Board and JOHN/JANE DOES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC H. OLIVER
Ortagus Bennett v. Randy Smith
as 19-2055
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GARRETT, in his individual and representative capacity as a agent for the US Drug Enforcement Agency, JAMES & JOAN DOE 1-10, in their individual and representative capacities Agents of the State of South Carolina Law Enforcement Agencies, JOHN & JANE DOES 1 - 10, DEA agents in their individual and representative capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORTAGUS DEMETRICE BENNETT
Cynthia Scott v. Harold Clarke
as 19-1687
Plaintiff:
MARGUERITE RICHARDS, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, REBECCA L. SCOTT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, PATRICIA B. KNIGHT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC ALDRIDGE, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INCORPORATED, PAUL OHAI, a/k/a John/Jane Doe, M.D., Medical Director, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, DR. M. MILITANA, Medical Director, Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TONI HARTLOVE, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MELISSA ATKINS, CYNTHIA SCOTT, a prisoner residing at Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Bennett v. Smith et al
as 6:2019cv01799
Defendant:
James & Joan Doe 1-10, Randy Smith, John Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Ortagus Demetrice Bennett
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
John Dickson, Jr. v. McKinley Price
as 19-1426
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR MCKINLEY L. PRICE, In his individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of State Law, CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA, In its individual capacity as a person, acting under Color of State Law, CITY OF HAMPTON VIRGINIA POLICE TECHNICAL POLICE O JOHN/JANE DOE(S), In their individual capacities, as persons acting under Color of State Law and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
John Dickson, Jr. v. Former FBI Director
as 19-1430
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE DOE JOHNSON, In her individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of State Law, ANNALISA SCHAEPERKOETTER, In her individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of State Law, FBI AGENT MRS./MS. KATHERINE ANDREWS, Former Special Agent in Charge of the Newport News Field office, In her individual capacity, as a person acting under Color of federal and State Law and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN M. DICKSON, JR.
Jonathan Rouser v. John/Jane Doe
as 19-6301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ROUSER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN/JANE DOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
