Cases 11 - 20 of 485
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant:
ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent:
CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor:
THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee:
CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver:
MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Riman v. Koort et al
as 1:2023cv01099
Defendant:
Tanya Harvey doing business as NEWREZ LLC formerly known as New Penn Financial, LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Peter Koort VSB #34170 doing business as Equity Trustees, LLC, Carrie M. Ward doing business as BWW Law Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Omini Riman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
OptumHealth Care Solutions, LLC. v. Sandra Peters
as 23-239
Petitioner:
OPTUMHEALTH CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Respondent:
SANDRA M. PETERS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Aetna Inc. v. Sandra Peters
as 23-241
Petitioner:
AETNA INCORPORATED and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
SANDRA M. PETERS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Behrens v. Genworth Life Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Peter Behrens
Defendant:
Genworth Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
In Re: CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2023md03062
In Re:
CROP PROTECTION PRODUCTS LOYALTY PROGRAM ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANDERSON, FREDERICK C. CROSCUT, R & D ADAMS DAIRY FARM, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DAY FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. FARMS, DANNY DAY, JR. & SON FARM PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant:
SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION AG, SYNGENTA CORPORATION, SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
HELENA AGRI-ENTERPRISES LLC, BASF SE, BASF CORPORATION and others
Interested Party:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
In Re 2U, Inc. Securities Class Action
as 8:2019cv03455
Petitioner:
Employees' Retirement System of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DeKalb County Pension Fund, Herbert Saunders and others
Respondent:
Catherine A. Graham, 2U, Inc. and Christopher J. Paucek
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City Employee Retirement System
Defendant:
Harsha Mokkarala, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Compass Point Research & Trading, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Emerson College
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
