Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rockabilly's Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00651
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Rockabilly's Inc. and Samuel W. Burns
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Rockabilly's Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00617
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Rockabilly's Inc. and Samuel W Burns
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
US v. Michael Burn
as 10-4922
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BURNS
Banoro Garrett v. Sorento Burns
as 09-2396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BANORO GARRETT and CURTEL GARRETT
Defendant - Appellee:
SORENTO BURNS, ASHTON HARRIS PULLY, JR. and GREAGORY W. KLEIN
v. Garrett et al
as 2:2009cv00558
Defendant:
Banoro Garrett and Sorento Burns
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Burns v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority
as 2:2009cv01199
Plaintiff:
Robert Burns
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
US v. Keith Burns
as 09-4909
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITH LEE BURNS
DIRECTV, INC. v. SHORE et al
as 1:2009cv00707
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, INC.
Defendant:
DEANNA B. SHORE, JOHN RANSOM SHORE, CHRISTINA FITZPATRICK BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication/Use of Communications
Gott v. Faith Presbyterian et al
as 1:2008cv00795
Plaintiff:
David Gott
Defendant:
Faith Presbyterian and Christa Burns
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tillery et al v. Borden et al
as 8:2007cv01092
Plaintiff:
William Tillery, William Tillery, Rebecca Tillery and others
Defendant:
Harry L. Borden, National Investors Realty Management, LLC, National Investors Realty Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
