Cases 71 - 80 of 100
US v. Kenneth Pegram
as 10-5142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH LANE PEGRAM
US v. Mary Penland
as 10-7069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARY PENLAND
Party-in-Interest:
326 HANSA LANE GREER SC, 4318 EAST NORTH STREET and KENNETH C. ANTHONY, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES W. PENLAND, SR.
Trustee - Appellee:
JERRY SAAD
Lane v Capital One Bank USA NA
as 4:2010cv01564
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lane
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Reliable Contracting Company, Incorporated et al v. Breathwaite et al
as 1:2010cv00972
Plaintiff:
Reliable Contracting Company, Incorporated and Reliaster Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Phillip Breathwaite, Sr., Ella Jessica Lane, Bruce M. Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Owens v. McMasters et al
as 2:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
Curtis Q Owens
Defendant:
Henery McMasters , Jon Ozmint , Oscar Faulkenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lane v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2009cv01415
Plaintiff:
Gary Lane
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LANE
as 4:2009cv00200
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LORRAINE W. LANE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LANE
as 5:2009cv00494
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
LORRAINE W. LANE
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
THE UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AS RECEIVER FOR PENNY LANE PARTNERS, L.P. v. INFUSION CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPRATION et al
as 1:2009mc00051
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AS RECEIVER FOR PENNY LANE PARTNERS, L.P.
Defendant:
INFUSION CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPRATION and INVESTMENT CAPITAL HOLDINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
