Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ASHTON v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
KENT J ASTON and KENT J ASHTON
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Brickle v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 1:2021cv00327
Plaintiff:
William Brickle
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howard County, Maryland v. FAA
as 20-1585
Petitioner:
HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND
Respondent:
STEPHEN DICKSON, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Howard County, Maryland v. FAA
as 19-1062
Petitioner:
HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND
Undetermined:
STATE OF MARYLAND
Respondent:
DANIEL K. ELWELL, Acting Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Skydive Myrtle Beach Inc. v. Horry County Dept of Airport
as 16-2337
Petitioner:
SKYDIVE MYRTLE BEACH INC.
Respondent:
HORRY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Taylor v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 8:2015cv03934
Plaintiff:
John A. Taylor
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pardo v. Federal Aviation Administration
as 1:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
David Pardo
Defendant:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
COOTS et al v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2012cv01147
Interested_party:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
STUART E. COOTS and ROBERT DEXTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL P. HUERTA
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Fox v. Cirrus Design Corporation
as 1:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fox
Defendant:
Cirrus Design Corporation
Objector:
Federal Aviation Administration
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Dargan Haddock v. J. Babbitt
as 11-2194
Petitioner:
DARGAN DEWEY HADDOCK
Respondent:
J. RANDOLPH BABBITT, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
