Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Federal Highway Administration
as 24-1447
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, FRIENDS OF MOSES HALL, NORTHERN VIRGINIA CITIZENS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
GREGORY MURRILL, in his official capacity as Maryland Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, PAUL J. WIEDEFELD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Maryland Department of Transportation, SHAILEN BHATT, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Northern Virginia Citizens Association, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 1:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Citizens Association, Inc.
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Virginia Department of Transportation, W. Sheppard Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 National Environmental Policy Act
Northern Virginia Citizens Association v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 8:2022cv03336
Plaintiff:
Northern Virginia Citizens Association
Defendant:
Federal Highway Administration, Stephanie Pollack, Gregory Murrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Cooperation of Agencies; Reports
Potomac Heritage Trail Association, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Transportation et al
as 8:2022cv02482
Plaintiff:
Potomac Heritage Trail Association, Inc., Dahlgren Railroad Heritage Trail Association, Inc. and Oxon Hill Bicycle and Trail Club, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Maryland Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
No Mid-Currituck Bridge-Concerned Citizens v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
as 22-1103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NO MID-CURRITUCK BRIDGE-CONCERNED CITIZENS AND VISITORS OPPOSED TO THE MID-CURRITUCK BRIDGE and NORTH CAROLINA WILDLIFE FEDERATION
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, EDWARD T. PARKER, in his official capacity as Assistant Division Administrator, Federal Highway Administration and others
Defendant:
JAMES H. TROGDON, III
North Carolina Wildlife Federation et al v. North Carolina Department of Transportation et al
as 2:2019cv00014
Defendant:
James H. Trogdon, III, Edward T. Parker, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Wildlife Federation and No Mid-Currituck Bridge-Concerned Citizens and Visitors Opposed to the Mid-Currituck Bridge
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
Sierra Club v. NCDOT et al
as 4:2018mc00001
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club
Defendant:
NCDOT , Federal Highway Administration , John F. Sullivan, III and others
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al
as 2:2017cv03412
Plaintiff:
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District , Jeffrey S Palazzini , Todd T Semonite and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Save Our Sound, OBX, Inc. et al v. North Carolina Department of Transportation et al Administrative Record in case number 2:17-CV-4-FL
as 2:2017mc00001
Plaintiff:
Save Our Sound, OBX, Inc., Thomas Aschmoneit, Richard Ayella and others
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Transportation, James H. Trogdon, III, Federal Highway Administration and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Defenders of Wildlife and National Wildlife Refuge Association
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Save Our Sound OBX, Inc., et al v. North Carolina Department of Transportation, et al
as 2:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Save Our Sound OBX, Inc. , Mark Haines , Jer Mehta and others
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Transportation , Federal Highway Administration, John F. Sullivan, III and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Defenders of Wildlife and National Wildlife Refuge Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
