Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Raymond Shook v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00504
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Reeves et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03303
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Scott Reeves, Delbert Eugene Powell, Roderick Charles Prast and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Shook v. Adams
as 0:2021cv02204
Plaintiff:
Holly Shook
Defendant:
Alonzo E. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shook v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2020cv00242
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Donna S Shook and Jean S. Penland
Stallings v. Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co et al
as 3:2019cv00426
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Stallings
Defendant:
Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co., Sean Robert Fowler and Sunbelt Industrial Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stallings v. Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co et al
as 0:2019cv02369
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Stallings
Defendant:
Shook & Fletcher Insulation Co and Sean Robert Fowler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shook v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08141
Plaintiff:
Janice K Shook
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shook v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13670
Plaintiff:
Marie Shook
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shook v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv12730
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Shook
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Comer v. Reid et al
as 5:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Cynthia H. Comer
Defendant:
James Coy Reid , Bob Riley , Mark William Shook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
