Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Masters v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2021cv02804
Plaintiff:
Carlton Masters
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOYLES v. LANGMORE CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00545
Defendant:
EQUITY TRUST COMPANY and LANGMORE CAPITAL, LLC
Plaintiff:
CARLTON T. BOYLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hamilton et al v. Moving Nation Deliveries LLC
as 5:2019cv00527
Defendant:
Moving Nation Deliveries LLC
Plaintiff:
Mr. Carlton Hamilton and Ms. Kristina Hamilton
Ammons et al v. Ditech Financial LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01570
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth A. Ammons and Carlton B. Ammons
Defendant:
Ditech Financial LLC , Rosenberg & Associates, LLC and Commonwealth Trustees, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. Elam et al
as 3:2012cv00393
Plaintiff:
Chad Baker
Defendant:
Carlton Nicholas Elam and Elam Animal Hospital and Reproductive Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomlinson v. Bank of America
as 5:2010cv00510
Plaintiff:
Carlton Washington Tomlinson
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Nahigian v. Juno-Loudoun, LLC
as 10-2373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH NAHIGIAN and COURTNEY NAHIGIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JUNO-LOUDOUN, LLC
Defendant:
THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, L.L.C.
Keith Nahigian v. Juno-Loudoun, LLC
as 10-2231
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEITH NAHIGIAN and COURTNEY NAHIGIAN
Defendant - Appellant:
JUNO-LOUDOUN, LLC
Defendant:
THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, L.L.C.
Keith Nahigian v. Juno-Loudoun, LLC
as 10-2198
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEITH NAHIGIAN and COURTNEY NAHIGIAN
Defendant - Appellant:
JUNO-LOUDOUN, LLC
Defendant:
THE RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY, L.L.C.
Nahigian et al v. Juno-Loudoun, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00725
Plaintiff:
Keith Nahigian and Courtney Nahigian
Defendant:
Juno-Loudoun, LLC and The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
