Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Kimberly Spence v. Carl Willis, II
as 17-2428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIMBERLY T. SPENCE, f/k/a Kimberly S. Willis
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. WINDSOR
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL J. WILLIS, II
Defendant:
WELLSTAR MEDICAL GROUP PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT CENTER, ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH CARDINALS, of Atlanta, ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE, of Atlanta and others
SOUMAGBO v. CARDINAL HEALTH
as 1:2016cv01264
Plaintiff:
ADJOAVI V SOUMAGBO
Defendant:
CARDINAL HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Moore v. Michael Morgan
as 16-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LAMONT MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MORGAN, ANDREW WHITLEY, MELISSA BISETTE and others
Moore v. Morgan, et al
as 5:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamont Moore
Defendant:
Michael Morgan, Andrew Whitley, Melissa Bisette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chance v. Cardinal Forest Homeowners Association et al
as 1:2015cv01206
Plaintiff:
Henry Chance
Defendant:
Cardinal Forest Homeowners Association , Landmarc Real Estate , Kelly Carder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chance et al v. Cardinal Forest Homeowners Association et al
as 1:2012cv00591
Defendant:
Michael Carder, Landmarc Real Estate, Doug Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Audrey Aird and Henry Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
