Cases 31 - 40 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McDaniel v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools et al
as 3:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Patricia Falk and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Lane et al v. Dorn Veterans Hospital et al
as 3:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Patsy Maria Lane
Defendant:
Dorn Veterans Hospital, VA Fiduciary Hub, Chiquetta Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ertsey v. Perry
as 3:2017cv01917
Plaintiff:
Richard Gabriel Ertsey
Defendant:
Katie Hall Perry, Richland County Family Court, Allan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ertsey v. Perry
as 3:2017cv01918
Plaintiff:
Richard Gabriel Ertsey
Defendant:
Katie Perry, Richland County Family Court, Allan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hippocratic Growth, LLC et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Queen Anne's County et al
as 1:2017cv00441
Plaintiff:
Hippocratic Growth, LLC , 111 Scher Lane, LLC and 101 Drummer Drive, LLC
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Queen Anne's County and Michael Wisnosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1984
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
