Cases 31 - 40 of 3,215
Michael Parker v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company Limited Partnership
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. PARKER and PATRICE PARKER
Intervenor:
ALICE MEJIA
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS MORTGAGE COMPANY, Limited Partnership and NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Maryland Department of Human Services v. Leftridge
as 1:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Maryland Department of Human Services
Defendant:
Vernon J. Leftridge, Jr.
Interested Party:
The Montgomery County Department of Health and Human Services and Maryland Office of Administrative Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Zachary Herb v. City of Asheville, North Carolina
as 24-1383
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY HERB
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA and BEN WOODY, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Development Services Department for City of Asheville, North Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
