Cases 51 - 60 of 440
Oxendine v. Hunt et al
as 7:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Gregory Oxendine
Defendant:
Garrett Paul Hunt, Brian Jefferson Chavis, Colin Deen Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lewis v. Rao, et al
as 3:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
Michael Rao, Ph.D. and Virginia Commonwealth University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cameron Lewis v. Kevin Caraballo
as 22-2115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAMERON LEWIS, individually
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN CARABALLO, individually, and in his official capacity as a Maryland State Police Officer/Trooper
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF MARYLAND STATE POLICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Scott et al v. Syneos Health, LLC
as 5:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Jami Lynn Scott, Shannon Sulander, Janna Stewart and others
Defendant:
Syneos Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oxendine v. Hunt et al
as 4:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Gregory Oxendine
Defendant:
Garrett Paul Hunt, Brian Jefferson Chavis, Colin Deen Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
