Cases 81 - 90 of 104
WILSON v. THE COUNTY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2011cv01065
Plaintiff:
LINWOOD E. WILSON
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, MIKE RUFFIN, WORTH HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv03126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin Reaves v. Mullins Police Dept
as 11-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, Reverend, VASTENA REAVES, DONALD N. REAVES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MULLINS POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARION COUNTY, TERRY B. STRICKLAND, individually and in his official capacity as member of Mullins City Council and others
Appellee:
W. KENNETH MCDONALD, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor
Clayton v. Kent
as 2:2010cv02597
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Clayton, Jr
Defendant:
Shaun Kent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. Kent et al
as 1:2010cv02707
Plaintiff:
Melvin James Yates
Defendant:
Sean Kent, J.J. Gibbons and Ryan Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herbert Hayes v. Burton & Sue, L.L.P.
as 10-2051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HERBERT HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
BURTON & SUE, L.L.P., GARY KENT SUE, TEAGUE, ROTENSTREICH, STANALAND, FOX & HOLT and others
Reverend Reaves v. Mullins, City of
as 10-1979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. REAVES, PhD and VASTENA REAVES, All others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MULLINS, MARION COUNTY, W. KENNETH MCDONALD, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Yates v. Kent et al
as 1:2010cv01543
Plaintiff:
Melvin James Yates
Defendant:
Sean Kent, J. J. Gibbons, Ryan Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
