Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Twin County Regional Healthcare et al
as 7:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Smith
Defendant:
Twin County Regional Healthcare, Four Unnamed Doctors and Nurses of Twin County Regional Healthcare, Karl R. Hade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. Abbott et al
as 2:2021cv00201
Defendant:
Office of Attorney General Child Support Division, Gregory Wayne Abbott, Skibell, Bohach & Archer, P.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lonnie Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker v. Marston et al
as 1:2017cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Parker
Defendant:
Charles T. Marston, Jr. , Willis A. Archer and Walter Clyde Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
