Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dineen Etienne v. Machelle Sanders
as 24-1044
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
MACHELLE SANDERS, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Administration; North Carolina Department of Commerce, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL, Division Executive Director, Historically Underutilized Businesses, BENNY SLOAN, DBW Certification Officer, North Carolina Department of Transportation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1775
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
REMINGTON v. NC DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY et al.
as 1:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
MARIA S. REMINGTON
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY and PRYOR GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James v. Omni Hotel Management Corp et al
as 3:2020cv00428
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Commerce and Omni Hotel Management Corp
Plaintiff:
Marvin James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. South Carolina Department of Transportation Commission et al
as 2:2019cv02330
Defendant:
Secretary of Trade of South Carolina, South Carolina Department of Commerce, South Carolina Department of Transportation Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony G Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
