Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
WARREN v. PETERY et al
as 1:2020cv00793
Defendant:
FRIENDLY FOOT CENTER & OFFICE STAFF, JOHN A. PETERY and KAREN DEJESUS
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 17-1672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
TANDY CARTER, individually for damages for qui tam recovery, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Tandy Carter
as 14-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA JEAN BURNS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, individually for damages and for qui tam recovery, GINGLIAT, BETTIS AND SAVITZ LAW FIRM, THE, in its corporate capacity, for damages and for qui tam recovery and others
ASSA'AD-FALTAS v. CARTER et al
as 1:2014cv00678
Plaintiff:
MARIE-THERESE H. ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MD
Defendant:
TANDY CARTER, BARBARA JEAN BURNS, SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00184
Plaintiff:
Leonardo DeJesus
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Fudge v. Narewski et al
as 3:2008cv03227
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Deon Fudge
Defendant:
St Narewski, Dejesus Emmanuel and City Of Columbia
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
