Cases 1 - 10 of 446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kenya Teasley v. Elizabeth O'Brien
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH CURRAN O'BRIEN
Campbell McGagh v. The Supreme Court of Maryland et al
as 8:2024cv00998
Plaintiff:
Karen Elizabeth Campbell McGagh
Defendant:
The Supreme Court of Maryland, Honorable Matthew Fader, Honorable Shirley M. Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS and others
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
Elizabeth Roberts v. John Does 1 to 2
as 24-1241
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2 and CITY OF HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND, A Municipal Corporation
Campbell McGagh v. The Supreme Court of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Karen Elizabeth Campbell McGagh
Defendant:
The Supreme Court of Maryland, Honorable Matthew Fader, Honorable Shirley M. Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Alexander v. Joint Base Andrews et al
as 8:2024cv01240
Plaintiff:
Kurt Alexander
Defendant:
Joint Base Andrews, Secretary Frank Kendall, Jason Stack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
TEASLEY v. O'BRIEN
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
KENYA TEASLEY
Defendant:
ELIZABETH O'BRIEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. The State of New Jersey et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
The State of New Jersey, Union County Prosecutor's Office, Elizabeth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
